UN Resolution on Jerusalem: When Veto was Vetoed

By: Azhar Azam

On December 21 – 193 membered United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) starkly adopted a resolution by 128-9 that condemned US decision to recognize Jerusalem as capital of Israel and pressed all countries to refrain from establishing diplomatic missions in Jerusalem.

By dint of a negative vote or veto by one of the five permanent members – United States – the UN Security Council could not adopt the December 18 draft resolution which was supported by four other permanent members – China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom – and fourteen non-permanent members of the UN Security Council.

Guatemala, Honduras, Israel, Marshall Islands, Federation States of Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Togo and United States were the nine countries who opposed the resolution. Two of the major American allies – France and the United Kingdom – as well as the newest strategic US partner – India – also voted in favor of the resolution.

The crux of the session was the moment when the world witnessed a rare glimpse of all Muslim countries unanimously endorsing the resolution. Arch rivals from Iran to Saudi Arabia to strategic adversaries like Pakistan and Afghanistan – almost all the Muslim majority countries hailed the common cause by supporting or at least abstaining.

Fumed United States immediately navigated a cut of over $285 million to the United Nations’ biennium budget of $5.4 billion for 2018-2019, US ambassador to UN Nikki Haley said in a statement. The mission also announced unspecified reduction in UN’s management and support functions.

Translating the rage, the US mission in the UN Haley touted ‘inefficiency and overspending of the United Nations’ for the funds prevention and vowed it a big step ‘toward a more efficient and accountable UN’.

Under the UN charter, the United States contributed 22% of the total UN regular budget in 2017 that amounts to about $611 million. It is also the largest contributor – 28.5% – to the UN peacekeeping operations budget that totals $7.3 billion.

Japan (10%), China (8%), Germany (6%), and France (5%) were the other largest contributors to the UN regular budget in 2017.

But historically the UN budget tends to reduce every year. For example the budget for biennium 2016-17 was roughly $400 million or 2.9% lower than the final appropriations for 2014-2015. Similarly the two-year budget for 2017-2018 also sets budget level $286 million or 5% less below the final approved level of 2015-2016.

Furthermore,in her tweet on June 29 this year, Haley announced half a billion ($600 million) cut to UN peacekeeping budget. Before assuming the president office White House, Trump also professed UN ‘just a club for people to get together, talk, and have a good time’.

So the reduction in financial contribution to UN budget is not attributable to US decision over UN resolution on Jerusalem – as framed to be – but conforms to one of the Trump’s election campaign promises, though the US reaction at this instant is apparently an effort to synthetically fabricate the reduction with the Jerusalem resolution.

UN is funded by the member countries and the contribution of each country is determined on the basis of certain assessment – GNP, per capita income, and external debt. The United States is obliged to pay more due to its higher economic resources and the cut to UN budget is yet another paragon of US violating UN rules.

Moreover, by providing increased (but due) financial contribution to the UN budget, the United States hardly makes any contribution to the UN peacekeeping troops. US troop contribution to the UN in only 56, according to ranking provided by the international body as of November 30.

Ethiopia (8,387), Bangladesh (7,240), India (6,700), Rwanda (6,490), Pakistan (6,256), and Nepal (5,353) are the largest troop contributing countries for UN peacemaking missions. Incidentally, four of the six top contributors – Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Nepal –are from South East Asia.

Pakistan won’t serve as Victim to ‘America First’ Mantra

By: Azhar Azam

In a secret and hasty trip, US vice president Mike Pence barely touched Afghanistan in an ordinary military transport plane to conceal his arrival and addressed 15,000 US troops to make them believe that that ‘victory is closer than ever before’.

The ‘Sycophant’ then donned a bulletproof vest and went to meet Afghan government officials under cover of darkness and a heavily armed helicopter convoy to discuss new US security strategy and to break the stalemate in the America’s longest war.

Cellphone and internet connections of the reporters traveling with the Pence were disconnected over security concerns until Pence was about to leave the war-torn country after spending only about eight hours.

Charting the newly US national security strategy (NSS) – Pence harried Pakistan to stop providing safe havens to Afghan Taliban and other terrorist organizations and urged Pakistan to gain from US partnership or has much to lose otherwise.

Trump’s Administration is vainly employing all pressing tactics – including safe havens to terrorists and falling nuclear weapons in the hands of the terrorists – to persuade Pakistan for a military engagement in Afghanistan.

Buoying the partisan folklore, now NSS craves to pester Pakistan by vouching to deepen strategic relationship with India and supporting its role in the region alongside encouraging India ‘to increase its economic assistance in the region’.

The burning point is that the United States is seeking India to increase economic assistance not only in Afghanistan but in the entire region. Does the United States is supporting Indian economic assistance in Iran too to counter China’s B&R.

At the same time, the hottest security strategy also assures to cajole Pakistan by building trade and investment ties with Pakistan if it will assist the United States in its ‘counterterrorism goals’.

Just a few days back, Pentagon chief spokesperson Dana W. White – referring to James Mattis visit to Pakistan – said in a press briefing that no one has lost more troops and lives to terrorism than Pakistan.

For almost a year, Pakistan is United States’ Aunt Sally and the Trump Administration is nearly convinced that it could compel Pakistan to serve as victim purported for ‘US global security goals’ and ‘America First’ mantra.

So the United States is clearly maneuvering ‘a carrot-and-stick approach’ to coax or coerce Pakistan and its armed forces – counter to its own interests – to serve American interests and goals in Afghanistan and region.

But Pakistan has taken a strong stance to serve its national interests – not to engage in any conflict beyond its territory and has continuously denied to forfeit the achievements it availed in war on terror after losing thousands of troops and innocents.

It’s such a silly on the part of the United States to expecting Pakistan and its armed forces to protect America and its allies and partners by invading in Afghanistan after their troops sprinted out of the devastated country.

According to State Department’s Country Reports on Terrorism 2016 – From 2012 to 2016, total terrorist attacks and deaths in Pakistan have declined substantially from 1,823 and 1,761 to 535 and 433 respectively – an attestation of the country’s success.

The terrorist movement and infiltration on Pak-Afghan border has also been restricted through various vital measures such as increased troops deployment, surveillance, and border management including fencing.

The backcloth of the latest rhetoric connects with the meeting of NATO defense ministers after which General John Nicholson called for the allies to contribute more troops for the war against Afghan Taliban and other insurgents but to no avail.

Currently about 15,000 US troops and around 8,400 other NATO troops are deployed in Afghanistan and only for Resolute Support (RS) mission (non-combat) mission. US is expecting Pakistan to do what 150,000 US and NATO forces failed to achieve in Afghanistan despite spending over $877 billion in Afghanistan.

On the other hand, Trump’s echo of the ‘massive payments’ to Pakistan is vastly embroidered. In FY2017, the United States has paid only $130 million to Pakistan for various social, education, health, and security programs.

China, Russia, South Korea, and Iran

Trump Administration’s four-pillared national security strategy also blames China and Russia for eroding American Security and prosperity – blasting both the countries for challenging American power, influence, and interests in the areas of trade, military, and information as well as developing advanced weapons and capabilities that could threaten American critical infrastructure and its command and control architecture.

NSS additionally boards South Korea and Iran for destabilizing regions, threaten Americans and its allies, and brutalizing their own people – North Korea is the most likely state to use nuclear weapon against United States.

Four Pillars of American National Security Strategy

First, our fundamental responsibility is to protect American people, the homeland, and American way of life by strengthening control on our borders, reforming immigration system, protecting critical infrastructure, going after the cyber actors. A layered missile defense system will defend our homeland against missile attacks. And we will pursue their source, so that the jihadist terrorists are stopped before they ever reach our borders.

Second, we will promote American prosperity by rejuvenating the American economy for the benefit of American workers and the American companies. We will insist upon fair and reciprocal relationships to address trade imbalances. The United States must preserve its lead in research and technology and protect its economy from competitors who unfairly acquire our intellectual property.

Third, we will preserve peace through strength by rebuilding our military so that it remains preeminent, deters our adversaries, and if necessary, is able to fight and win. We expect all allies and partners to shoulder a fair share of the burden of responsibility to protect against common threat.

Fourth, we will advance American influence because a world that supports American interests and reflects our values makes America more secure and prosperous. We will compete and lead in multilateral organizations so that American interests and principles are protected.

Irrespective of the number of pillars to protect American people, the homeland, its interests and influence – American people must question Trump Administration as why the State and 2,129,900 troops, marines, and airmen with defense budget of over $600 billion per year, cannot protect America and American people and why the US is relying on Pakistan to protect them.

APS Attack: Never to Forget and Never to Forgive

By: Azhar Azam

‘My opinion is that we had sent our children to the school not to the battlefield. How they be Shaheeds’, father of 8th grade student ‘Ghasan’ martyred in APS attack said. ‘When someone goes to the war, they move with weapons, not with pens.’

The families of APS martyrs have been demanding judicial commission to fix the responsibility of security lapse and to avoid any such incidence in future. Their other demand is to include APS attack in textbooks.

‘The inclusion of a chapter on the APS carnage in textbooks will keep the tragic incidence alive forever’, President APS Shuhada Foundation Abid Raza Bangash demanded for at least ‘a source of consolation for them’.

December 16, 2014 is the darkest day in the history of Pakistan when 147 people including 134 schoolchildren were martyred and over 120 people injured in a callous terrorist attack on Army Public School (APS) Peshawar.

Six TTP terrorists – all of them were foreign nationals – stormed into the school and opened fire to kill mostly the children aged 8 to 18 and other school staff members – stunning the whole country into a condition of absolute coma.

Studying and playing innocent kids – unaware with definition of terrorism – were shot in heads, hearts and legs to get acquainted with the evil. They were vainly trying to hide and escape from the malicious eyes and raining bullets of those bloodthirsty terrorists.

This wicked act of terrorism had also left a terrible effect on millions of school-going children and their parents in the country. But the credit goes to national securities forces, led by Pakistan army, who have almost clinically eliminated this malignancy from the country and sluiced the environment of fear and trauma.

On the front, Pakistan security forces were sacrificing to secure Pakistan and back home, their children were targeted too. One cannot feel the woe the soldiers or other parents went through while hearing the shaking news of their kids’ demise in the hands of the terrorists.

We must remember that these children were neither on a combat mission, nor were they martyred for commemoration, or for earning any kind of tribute – as modeled by most of the political, media and social circles.

They were gone to school just to learn – not to become victim of this kind of barbaric act of terrorism, as most of the parents shouted. They were too young and too innocent to get involved in such ogre strife.

Most unfortunately the parents are – despite killings and injuries of their children – are snagged by the ‘representatives of people’ who have rarely lost their lives for national cause and mostly died in pursuit of the power lust. The government officials have seldom visited the martyred children and school staff aggrieved families to show their harmony for the deceased.

The parents are not concerned about their cozy support or continuing the so-called kids’ mission. They are stunned, motionless and shredded with that one of the most ruinous, the direst, the most calamitous or the most tragic incident in the history. Nobody can measure the pain, misery, affliction, and sadness just a tear drop contains of the departed souls' family members.

They do not need our futile backing, support or assistance on social media or candlelight vigils for the little victims. They did not send their kids to carry any kind of mission, show the power of the pen to the terrorists or campaign for education.

Pragmatically the kids are sent to school to learn, dream, play and transform their personalities but we are rather trying to cover their virtuousness and innocence in the zones of terrorism, missions, coffins or marking December 16 as black day.

The purpose of criticizing such acts is not to stain the intentions or care for the children passed away, injured and their families but to force toward a step ahead and strive for secure, conducive and nourishing environment for our children instead of pushing them in the tons of stress, trauma and depressing trials.

The parents and the families must be infuriated and lamented over such ineffective and barren proceedings and would be expecting all of us to canvassing for taking revenge from each and every terrorist, terror financier and facilitator.

If we are to gratify the souls of our little angels, wounded roses and their unfortunate family members – we have to unite surrendering the conventional evils of groupings, ethnicity, sectarianism, party-ism and racism.

And we must collectively make an effort to go all-out for Pakistan to free it of terrorism, corruption and social evils so that our children may not be harassed, dismayed, and worried on the way to their bright and productive future.

And if we cannot adhere to these basic tenets mandatory to secure our people and children – we must at least support the ones contributing to this noble national cause.

How prejudice is that the highest dignitaries and the world leaders of 40-countries had shown solidarity arm-in-arm with France and war on terror on the killing of 12 people in ‘Charlie Hedbo’ attack but our little, innocent souls were buried to graves in the tears, cries and pains of helpless parents in the same war on terror.

May Allah Almighty reward those passed away kids and other Muslims the best of places in heavens and save us all and our children for any other or such unforeseen catastrophe.

Myanmar: Rohingya Muslims Need Military Support, Not just Prayers, Financial Aids, and Diplomatic Roars

By: Azhar Azam

A recent AP report finds that the rape of Rohingya Muslim women has been ‘sweeping’ and ‘methodical’ after interviewing 29 women and girls ‘separately’ and ‘extensively’ with age range between 13 and 35 who fled Myanmar to Bangladesh.

A woman, 22, shared with Associated Press the searing episode of Myanmar security forces’ sexual assault while she and her husband were sleeping in their home on a night of June.

Seven soldiers raided her house, shot her husband in the chest and slit his throat, and gang-raped her. Just a few days back, she had heard of the killing of her parents and also about his brother who was missing.

Myanmar security forces has systematically been employing rape and sexual violence as a terror tool and killing Muslims, billed as ‘ethnic cleansing’ to suppress voices of basic human rights in its state of Rakhine (Arakan).

According to a most conservative estimate by an international humanitarian aid group – Doctor without Borders – 6,700 Rohingya people have been killed as a result of violence in Rakhine between August 25 and September 24.

The report further estimates that this toll by violence includes no less than 730 children below the age of five who also lost their lives in ‘clearance operation’ conducted by Myanmar security forces

Also known as MSF – acronym of Médecins Sans Frontières – the philanthropic body believes that the numbers of killings are likely to be much higher as the surveys did not account for all the displaced persons settled in refugee camps and also the families who never fled Myanmar.

There were 69% violence-related deaths, 9% burnt to deaths in their houses, and 5% beaten to deaths. Among the children killed below the age of five – 59% were shot, 15% burnt alive in their homes, 7% beaten to deaths, and 2% died in landmine blasts.

Dr. Sidney Wong explained the Burmese brutality that there were also the reports that the ‘entire families who were perished after they were locked inside their homes, while they were set alight’.

Nearly 650,000 Rohingya Muslims have fled Myanmar to seek refuge in Bangladesh since the Burmese military crackdown on Rohingya Muslims in Rakhine in the aftermath of Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) attacks.

In an interview with Dhaka Tribune, an ARSA commander Abdus Shakoor defended his attack with 200-natives (out of various attacks by several groups) on Myanmar border police posts and a military base on August 25.

'To save our people, to save our mothers and sisters, to take back our rights, we took up sticks, and axes, and knives and rose up against oppressors.’

Burma, renamed Myanmar in 1989, was under British colonial rule during 1824-1942 before Japan invaded; pushing British out of the territory. British evacuation provoked Burmese nationalists to attack Muslims communities in then-Burma.

In 1945, British liberated Burma from Japan with the help of Burmese nationalists and latter created independent Union of Burma in 1948; defying promise to give autonomy to Rohingya Muslims in Rakhine (Arakan), living in the land since 8th century.

Tensions soared between the newly established Burma and Rohingya Muslims; most of whom wanted Arakan inclusion in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh). Jinnah however regretted due to lesser Muslims’ proportionate to Burmese population and opined that Rohingya Muslims should strive for their rights within Burma.

In 1978, General Ne Win conducted a large scale military operation Nagamin (also known as Operation King Dragon) in northern Arakan that targeted and killed Rohingya Muslims. The operation forced 250,000 people to migrate Bangladesh – one million Rohingya Muslims have fled Myanmar to various countries.

Burma Citizenship Law enacted in 1982 which no longer recognized Rohingya as citizens of Burma – ensuing 800,000 Rohingya Muslims (1.1 million, according to some reports) stateless. Since then, Muslims in the region are the victims of dreaded exploitations by Burmese army including forced labor, rape, and religious torment.

Rohingya Muslims cannot travel without authorization, prohibited to work outside their villages, and even cannot marry without permission. They are also effectively barred to vote in General Elections so have no political representation in the state’s parliament to raise voice for harboring and protecting their basic rights.

They are the most persecuted community in the world that has been crammed between Myanmar (Formerly Burma) and Bangladesh (Formerly East Pakistan). Neither of the countries is willing to stomach them as citizen; leaving almost a million people at the disposal of high hills, tough weather, and miserable food and health conditions.

The recent spat in Rakhine began in 2012 when clashes between Muslims and Buddhists killed nearly 100 people, mostly Muslims; displacing 135,000 Muslims in IDP camps and forcing migration to tens of thousands as well. The IDPs and refugees headcount continues to grow immensely since then.

Myanmar military and Buddhist militants blazed and razed their homes across villages; burnt alive, tortured, and killed a number of men, women, and children; and gang raped women; flouting all international human rights codes.

A flash report by United Nations’ OHCHR published in February 2017 gives the following statistics, based on interviews with Rohingya Muslims fleeing from Myanmar (testimonies of witnesses):

· 65% reported killings

· 43% reported rapes (up to 52% in women, >18 years)

· 31% reported sexual violence

· 56% reported disappearances

· 64% reported beatings

· 64% reported burning or destruction of property

· 40% reported looting/theft of property

Majority of the rape victims were raped by more than one soldier, usually three to four and even up to eight soldiers.

In May this year, Myanmar military and Border Police Guards raped at least 32 Rohingya women in Kyan Taung area of Rakhine/Arakan. Arakan Rohingya National Organization (ARNO) strongly condemned this act of cruelty to victimize innocent women and urged United National to probe this loathsome act – futile though like many such earlier demands.

This outrageous genocide of by Myanmar military and Buddhist extremists did not pose a serious concern to ‘stability and development in the state’ but a scarce reprisal by Rohingya Muslims in October 2016 did!

On 9-October-2016, few Rohingya Muslims ambushed on Myanmar’s Border Guard Police (BGP) that killing nine policemen. International Crisis Group (ICG) was quick to declare it ‘a new Muslim insurgency’ in its report on 21-December-2016 that ‘threatens the prospects of stability and development in the state’ and ‘has serious implications’.

The Group muted on Rohingya Muslims’ killings, rapes, sexual violence, and even babies stabbed who were crying for milk to their mothers by Myanmar military, traced Muslim insurgent group Harakah al-Yaqin (HaY or Faith Movement) immediately. It also quickly uncovered that the movement is ‘led by a committee of Rohingya émigrés in Saudi Arabia’.

‘HaY was established and overseen by a committee of some twenty senior leaders headquartered in Mecca, with at least one member based in Madina.’ Recruitment and training of militia is said to be started in 2013 and supported by Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.

Ata Ullah or Hafiz Tohar, alias Ameer Abu Ammar and Abu Ammar Jununi, was identified in the backlash on brutal Myanmar forces and Buddhist extremists. Ata Ullah was born in Karachi and brought up and studied in Mecca – Saudi Arabia. HuY is now known as Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) and has estimated of 500 -600 fighters.

Myanmar and Indian intelligence agencies propagate that ARSA’s religious ideology comes from a group of Islamic clergy based in Saudi Arabia but its fighting commanders are all trained in Pakistan. Typical Indian mindset, blamed Lashkar-e-Taiba for picking recruits from refugee camps on Myanmar-Bangladesh border after 2012 riots.

But Rohingya diaspora is now escalating!

As Myanmar military oppression on Rohingya Muslims is growing, ARSA is burgeoning simultaneously, and with more intensity.

On 25-August-2017, in retaliation to the brutal crackdown by Myanmar’s security forces on Muslims that killed thousands and fled over a million, around 150 ARSA members armed with machetes, swords, deadly weapons and other armory carried out nearly 20 attacks on Burmese police camps and military bases leaving 71 dead and wounding many.

Yet again, Myanmar and Indian media is trying to figure out Pakistan connection with this indigenous Rohingya movement by indulging Hafiz Saeed from nowhere. In July 2015, Mizzima, a Myanmar daily, accused Lashkar-Taiba (LeT) and its adjoins Jamat-ud-Dawa (JuD) and Falah-e-Insaniyat Foundation (FIF) for radicalizing Rohingya Muslims on Myanmar-Bangladesh borders referring Indian intelligence sources.

'They (Indian intelligence) told Mizzima that LET through its front, Jamat-ud-Dawa (JUD) and Fala-I-Insaniyat Foundation (FIF), is ‘extremely active’ among the Rohingyas and other Muslims in Myanmar under cover of relief and rehabilitation.'

'In July 2012, during the Rakhine state riots in Myanmar, the LET front JUD organized ‘Difa-e-Mussalman Arakan Conference’ in Karachi and exhorted its cadres to recruit Rohingyas to avenge the riots.'

The newspaper also shares a picture showing Maulana Abdul Qudus Bermi of Harkat-ul-Jihad Islami (HuJ-I) Arakan (now merged into ARSA), migrated to Pakistan in 1980s, accompanying Hafiz Saeed in the conference to validate the indictment. Maulana is also supposed to hire Ata Ullah (Hafiz Tohar) for conducting activities in Myanmar.

The picture had gone viral in India and Indian media is still living off this five years old photograph to deport 14,000 immigrants back to Myanmar.

This demonstrations an obvious Indian influence in Myanmar and Bangladesh and to divert the attention of international community from grim humanitarian crisis and Myanmar’s atrocities on the helpless Rohingya Muslims.

But these are only a few sections in the Muslim countries who are effectively trying to stop Myanmar’s ruthless terrorism, otherwise, needless to mention, the frightful restraint by Muslim rulers who can sacrifice ‘all others’ to protect their regimes, kingdoms, lives, and lavish lifestyles.

Not just prayers, financial aids and diplomatic roars; Rohingya Muslims need military support to encounter this callous state terrorism and hence is a primitive test for Saudi-led Islamic Military Alliance to Fight Terrorism (IMAFT).

How strikingly great Iqbal (May Allah have mercy on him) delineated such a conduct lyrically:

یہ ناداں گر پڑے سجدے میں جب وقت قیام آیا 

Why Gwadar is Jewel in the Crown (CPEC) of China’s Belt and Road?

By: Azhar Azam

Enormous ruses have been arrayed to undermine the deep Pak-Sino relations but the ‘all-weather friendship’ remains free-of-spat. Though there have been rare frictions but the relationship between the two countries is pliant enough to absorb such minor shocks.

China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is the key component of China’s ambitious ‘Belt and Road (B&R) Initiative’ to envisage a greater plan of regional connectivity – to integrate land and sea routes across Eurasia.

The flagship project is set to propel a new era of trade and economic cooperation between China and Pakistan in several energy and infrastructure sectors alongside developing special economic zones (SEZs) and social sector development projects.

Already a number of mega energy and infrastructure projects are efficiently rolling under CPEC – some of those are near completion including five biggest projects – Gwadar Port, Karot Power Station, Transmission Line from Lahore to Matiari, Karachi Circular Railway, and Karakoram Highway.

The power dearth – the most vicious of all – will drop in Pakistan after 720MW Karot Hydropower Project – Xi’s first initiated Silk Road Fund project – connects to national grid by April 2021, chief information office of Chinese government said in a statement.

CPEC is divided into three different phases – which are expected to be completed by 2017-2018, 2020, and 2030. China legitimately prioritizes the first phase – to develop a new trade and transport route of 3,218km from Xinjiang, China to Gwadar, Pakistan.

The most-nattered mega project hinges on Gwadar port.

Work on Gwadar port has repeatedly been interrupted since 1998 and finally, the command of newly developed Gwadar port was handed over to China Overseas Port Holding Company (COPHC Pakistan) in 2013. COPHC officially took control of the Gwadar port for period of 40 years in April 2017.

Gwadar – gateway of CPEC – is a strategically located, deep sea port having deepest Birth of 14.5 meters (extendable up to 20 meters) and capable to accommodate large vessels of up to 70,000 DWT.

Also known as The Door of Wind, Gwadar can hugely develop the economy of Pakistan due to its presence at the convergence of three most important regions of the world – Middle East, Central Asia, and South Asia.

In addition, Gwadar is the closest Seaport from Western China – 2,395 kilometers, almost half of 4,500 kilometers through China’s East Coast from Xinjiang. It also gives transit trade route for landlocked Central Asian Republics (CARs) and Afghanistan.

Gwadar is supported by 923 hectares Large Free Zone, a number of Export Processing Zones (EPZs), and Trading Zones – operated by COPHC – that enjoys a tax holiday from federal, provincial, and local taxes of 20 years.

This massive area has the capacity to house bonded warehousing, manufacturing, international purchasing, transit and distribution, transshipment, commodity display, and supporting services such as business offices, custom, financial, information, hotels, restaurants, entertainment, medical etc. to prosper tourism sector in Pakistan.

China’ state-owned company (COPHC) will have a lion’s share in the revenues generated from Gwadar Port and Free Economic Zones (FEZs) until it runs into profitability after nine (9) years.

After nine (9) years of operational phase of this build, operate, and transfer (BOT) project – the Chinese company will retain 91% revenue of terminal and marine operations from Gwadar Port and also the 85% revenue of free trade activities.

Same as agreement with Port of Singapore Authority (PSA) – no share will be given to Pakistan during the operational phase. However after nine (9) years, Pakistan’s share from Gwadar Port and Free Trade Zones (FTZs) will be 9% and 15% respectively.

By the end of 2017, Gwadar will be capable to handle one million tons of cargo which is planned to reach 13 million tons within next five years, becoming largest South Asian port. After turning completely operational, Gwadar is expected to handle cargo of up to 400 million tons by 2030 that is close to ports of India's combined capacity of handling about 500 million tons a year.

What’s more CPEC route to Gwadar onwards would substantially reduce the transportation cost, distance, and travel time for Chinese goods to Europe and Middle East apart from extensive China’s dependence on Strait of Malacca as a waterway for its imports.

Gwadar port will help China to reduce sea distance by over one-half from Central China to Europe just through Central Asia by 7,847 – from prior 16,507 miles sea travel distance. The overland distance will also be confined to 1,750 miles through Karachi – from previous 2,625 miles through Shanghai.

As a result, the transit time of goods will also be dropped by 50% – from existing 50-days travel route to only 25-days through CPEC.

This reduction in travel distance and time will invariably cut the transportation cost of the Chinese goods as well. Currently, the fright from 40-ft container Hamburg to Shanghai is $2,500 to $3,000. Once CPEC is operational, this cost would be reduced to $1,000 and in a half time.

The Gwadar port location at the mouth of Persian Gulf will also give China the direct access to Arabian Sea and near the key shipping routes obliging 17 million barrels of oil per day and large quantity of bulk, bulk-break, and containerized cargo.

CPEC will also magically minimize the cumulative distance from central China to Middle East to from 12,537 miles to 2,295 miles (80%) – predominately narrowing distance by sea from 9,912 miles to 545 miles between the two regions.

Similarly on Abu Dhabi-Shanghai route – a 40ft container consumes 16 days and costs a freight of $2000 whereas CPEC would galvanize to transport the same container at either place in only 2-3 days, that too for freight of $200-$250.

CPEC can potentially provide landlocked Afghanistan the shortest and much cheaper route to China, India, and Indian Ocean – approximately 600 kilometers shorter distance as compared to Chabahar.

Through Afghanistan, CPEC can provide participating countries an easy access to Far-East and Australia, making both one of the most dynamic transit routes in the world.

Gwadar is much more conducive port than Chabahar as the port charges on the latter would be much higher due to regular dredging to keep the port operational for bigger ships carrying 4,000 to 6,000 40ft containers.

The fee on account of the goods transportation – toll tax – is the key short term benefit to Pakistan’s economy. Pakistan can generate princely revenue by levying $25/ton of toll tax from Khunjerab to Gwadar Road. Chinese exporters will also be saving $50/ton and a reduced transportation time of 15-days.

Similarly, the cost of goods transportation from Xinjiang to Dubai port costs through Eastern China costs $130/ton to Chinese exporters. If these goods are transported through Gwadar, it would cost them only $50/ton – saving $80/ton and lesser transportation time to them and indeed the most- needed revenue to Pakistan economy.

Apart from trade and economic gains, China can establish a naval base in Gwadar with the help of Pakistan for conducting joint naval patrols in India Ocean to increase influence in brines and to counter common adversary, India.

The CPEC projects are also helping Pakistan to curb its unemployment dilemma and mentoring a skilled labor and trained professionals. According to a data provided by Planning Commission, about 30,000 Pakistani engineers and workers are employed in CPEC projects as well as 8,000 workers and engineers from China.

Various domestic and international organizations and experts give variable estimates of job creation in Pakistan from 400,000 to 800,000 through 2020 in several CPEC projects, pushing country’s economic growth by 2% to 2.5%.

Pakistan can also capitalize on Gwadar port in future by building bulk storage of oil tanks, oil refineries, establishment of petrochemical industries, ship repair yard, shrimp farming, vessel building yards, cold storages and ice factories, and recreational water sports activities.

As all the CPEC projects are performed on fast-track basis to timely translate and truly embrace the durable advantages of this dream projects – Pakistan is making all efforts including provision of special security forces to encounter the menace of terrorism targeting workers, infrastructure, and trade routes of CPEC.

Although the first phase of CPEC is yet to be completed but the profile of Pakistan is already repairing – thanks to valiant military operations conducted by Pakistan armed forces which have actively secured another developing another strategic asset – CPEC – correspondingly ensuring peace and stability in the country, injecting all important investor friendly environment for national economy.

Hard or Soft: Pakistan Won’t Be Trapped Now

No one has lost more troops and lives to terrorism than the Pakistan, Pentagon Chief Spokesperson Dana W. White said in a press briefing on Thursday – referring to Secretary Defense James Mattis who recently concluded his trip to Pakistan.

Rejoining to a loaded question about the kind of assurances Mattis received from Pakistan and actions against Haqqani Network, she further noted that the secretary has a very fruitful conversation with Pakistan and this is about broadening our relationship and looking for opportunities.

‘Pakistan has an interest in ensuring that terrorism is defeated. They’ve lost thousands of troops, and they’ve lost thousands of innocents as well …… so we‘ll look for ways to work with Pakistan is to find that common ground (terrorism or the threat of terrorism) and move forward.’

Explicating the ‘common ground’, White also stressed that it is in the interest of the US, the Pakistan, and the region to ensure and encourage political reconciliation in Afghanistan. She was holding the press briefing along with David L. Norquist, Undersecretary of Defense, Comptroller.

This is quite after some time that a US official has acknowledged Pakistan’s sacrifices in war on terror and prescribed a political settlement in Afghanistan. In October, Trump also appreciated Pakistan for rescuing a North American family from a Taliban-linked group hostage but his recognition lacked such acknowledgement.

According to latest official statistics, the US military casualties have reached 59,565 as of December 7, 2017 including 6,922 killings in several operations across various countries – mostly in Afghanistan and Iraq. In addition, a total of twenty one Department of Defense (DOD) civilians have also lost their lives in global war on terror.

As a result the United States was nearly extracted from Afghanistan and Iraq – except for troops dedicated to NATO Resolute Support mission in Afghanistan. Resolute Support is purely a non-combative support mission which prerogative is to only train, advise, and assist Afghan security forces.

Around the unremitting deteriorating situation in Afghanistan and Iraq – Pentagon urged Congress to pass the Fiscal Year 2018 Defense Appropriation Bill on Wednesday. To the frustration of the Department of Defense, Congress has been delaying the authorization of $639bn despite frequent requests.

Pentagon Spokesman Army Col. Robert Manning was clearly riled by the delay. ‘Continuing resolutions immediately disrupt training, impede readiness recovery, delay maintenance, impose uncertainty on the workforce, and induce inefficient and constrained contracting practices’.

He further said that the men and the women of the department deserve the certainty and also the department cannot begin new programs or new construction during a continuing resolution. ‘The longer (continuing resolution) last, the more damage they do’, Manning exclaimed.

Pentagon prioritizes three areas during fiscal year 2018 – improve war-fighting readiness, achieve program balance by addressing pressing shortfalls, and build a larger, more capable, and more lethal joint force.

The DOD major planned investments for the year are: aircraft ($22.2bn); shipbuilding ($$18.8bn); preferred munitions, ground systems, and missile defense ($7.5bn), science and technology innovation ($13.2bn), and supporting families ($8.0bn).

The number of US service members at the end of FY2018 totals 1,018,000 soldiers, 386,900 sailors, 223,500 marines, and 501,500 airmen including active, guard, and reserve.

Travel Ban: A US Policy Exists for Years

By: Azhar Azam

Trump Administration finally broke the losing-streak when the Supreme Court gave a verdict in its favor to enforce travel ban on aliens from several nations – predominately Muslim countries to ‘protecting Americans’.

In his newer version of September 24 proclamation – Donald Trump imposed certain ‘travelling limitations and restrictions’ on nationals from Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen.

Supreme Court ruling gives an odd win for astute Trump’s abhorrent, polemic, and despicable physiognomies to tactically exploit the two indispensables instilled in most Americans – nationalism and racism.

A distinct revelation in the edict confirms it which argues a Politico/Morning Consult poll showing 60% of the Americans supported these Trump’s travel restrictions. No less than a shock that the world’s most powerful administration is relying on public polls.

On the political front – the occasional success will also help him to prolong his maturing impeachment. Nevertheless, the decree is still subject to appeals and reviews in several federal courts of the country.

The prior January 27 (clarified on January 29) executive order – to temporarily ban nationals of Iraq, Iran, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, and Yemen to entering into the United States – was knocked over by the courts immediately.

After the beat, the Trump Administration reworked and expanded the travel ban to Venezuela and North Korea to brand it more tolerable to the top court. Entry restrictions on Iraq were omitted due to ‘great screening security’.

Although Trump might be admired in the epidemic of these topical developments but in the backdrop of the US political history – he is no different to his predecessors who all assumed such measures.

The step is widely beheld as an accomplishment of Trump’s promise during election campaign to banning Muslims’ entrance into the United States but the reality is that this is a Muslim travel ban exists for years.

In fact, these Muslim-majority countries were already on the radar of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under Obama Administration following Paris 2015 attacks that the latest Trump’s travel edition verifies.

Firstly, DHS included four countries – Iran, Iraq, Sudan, and Syria on January 21, 2016 and later on February 18, 2016 added three more countries – Libya, Somalia, and Yemen, as countries of concern.

The Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015 became law on December 18, 2015.

Under this act, on January 21, 2016 – US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) announced that it has intensively scrutinized a million passengers everyday travelling to the United States who either nationals of , been present or traveled to Iran, Iraq, Sudan, or Syria on or after March 11, 2011.

In further travel restrictions, on February 16, 2016 – DHS continued the implementation of the Act and included certain individuals who have traveled to Libya, Somalia, and Yemen – three additional countries of concern.

Thirteen year back – this memorandum was issued by DHS under George W. Bush regime on November 1, 2004 which patently designates 35 countries and territories ‘as special interest countries’ – mostly Muslim peopled.

And importantly – Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen were already included in the countries of concern for the United States.

Consequently Trump is actually enforcing a hoarier US travel policy targeting Muslim-dominated countries – and he is only the new face to implement the pre-devised establishment agenda.

Is India Really a Victim of Terrorism as the Fiend Kindles in Iraq but Trims in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nigeria and Syria

By: Azhar Azam

The economic impact of terrorism is only 1% of the total global economic impact of violence – revealed Institute of Economics & Peace (IEP) in its so-called research paper ‘Global Terrorism Index (GTI) 2017’ released this month.

Terrorism sparked global economy an impact of $84 billion in 2016 – only a trifling aggregate as compared to economic impact caused by violence that reached $14.3 trillion in 2016 or 12.6% of the global GDP.

Previously, GTI 2014 had also discovered that global homicide killings are 13-times more than the deaths from terrorism. At-least 437,000 people die of homicides every year, which is 13-times more than the victims of terrorism.

Globally, there has been 17% increase in terrorist attacks on civilians in 2016. The year 2016 also observed a unique resemblance due to similar increase in deaths from terrorism (67%) and battles (66%).

The overall score of global GTI however deteriorated by 4% in 2016 as terrorist activities expanded in 77 countries as compared to 65 countries last year – with at least one death caused by terrorism.

Independent, non-profit think tank however suggests that although the economic impact of terrorism is much small but it is vital to contain it over its potential to expand quickly and kindle major social consequences.

2017 GTI finds that the number of deaths from terrorist attacks have declined for the second consecutive year in 2016 to 25,673 people – 13% less from 2015 (29,376 deaths) and 22% fewer than peak 2014 (32,685 deaths).

Five countries – Afghanistan, Iraq, Nigeria, Pakistan, and Syria together comprised about 75% of total deaths from terrorism in 2016.

The report explores that terrorism widely prevailed in Middle East and North Africa (MENA), South Asia, and sub-Sahara Africa regions – otherwise mainly in most parts of Asia and Africa. Nearly 84% of all terrorists’ attacks and 94% of all deaths from terrorism resulted only from these regions.

In comparison, Central America and the Caribbean accounted for 0.05% of the total attacks and deaths – lowest levels of terrorism.

Except for Iraq that witnessed 40% death increase attributed to ISIS, ISIL or IS – terrorism has fallen in the other four epicenters in 2016 – Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, and Nigeria those all recorded a consolidated decline of 33%. 

Nigeria has been the pick of the countries which impressively confined deaths from terrorism by 80% in 2016 – 3,100 fewer deaths as a result of 80% decline in deaths attributed to Boko Haram.

Afghanistan also showed some recovery as the deaths from terrorism in the country fell by 14% in 2016. This decline is however attributable to Afghan Taliban tactical shift to focusing on conventional armed conflict with Afghanistan security forces.

In 2016, there were nearly 18,000 battle-related deaths in Afghanistan – that is 700 more deaths in 2015 and the largest since US invasion in the devastated country in 2001 after September 9.

For the third consecutive year, Pakistan witnessed fewer terrorist attacks and deaths. In 2016, there were 956 deaths from terrorism – lowest in a decade (since 2006), 12% fewer than 2015, and 59% less than peak 2013.

IEP classifies these improvements ‘notable’, ascribing this success to Pakistan’s military effort ‘Zarb-e-Azab’ started in mid-2014, as the country has a long history of high levels terrorism and this year’s result is the best in a decade.

The trend outlines the decline in the terrorist activities of TTP which is responsible for over half of the deaths from terrorism in Pakistan. The military estimates to kill over 3,500 TTP terrorists besides destroying their hideouts and infrastructure in the country.

Subsequently as a result of comprehensive military operation, Pakistan upgraded its ranking in GTI to #5 in 2016 – for the first time ever. The South Asian country has been ranked as at least 4th worst country for terrorism since 2007 and was ranked 2nd on six occurrences.

After a radical wave of civil war in the last decade – terrorism in Syria paraded a slight improvement in deaths from terrorism in 2016 as the terrorism death toll fell 24% – to 2,102 due to 75% decline in deaths from terrorism attributed to Al-Nusra Front.

Afghanistan, Syria, and Yemen are the countries that saw 500 fewer deaths from terrorism year-over-year.

Iraq is the country that has consistently been most impacted by terrorism for last 13 years. In 2016, terrorism in Iraq killed 2,803 more people than 2015 – an increase of 40%. The country witnessed one of the largest deaths increase due to nearly 1,000 attacks carried by Islamic State (Daesh), killing 7,351 people.

Egypt (9x) and Turkey (16x) experienced substantial increase in terrorism whereas for the first time, Turkey has been included in top-10 countries those have been affected by terrorism mainly due to increased activities of Kurdistan Worker’s Party (PKK) and ISIL.

India is constantly the surprise inclusion in several global terrorism indices by IEP – has been ranked between 2nd and 6th from 2002 to 2015. Despite the increase in the terrorist attacks (+16%), the GTI score of India has improved for the last two years.

This is because, unlike in other countries where single terrorist group is involved in killings – 39 militant organizations are operating in India predominately left wing extremists (LWE) like Maoists or Naxalites parties promoting the communist ideology ‘due to abject poverty, deprivation, exploitation, displacement of people, and social injustice’.

Maoists or Naxalites are responsible for more than half of the attacks and 88% of the deaths in India. IEP also cites two deadliest Islamic groups – Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Hizbul Mujahideen (HuM) – for fatal militant activities in 2015 in Indian-occupied Kashmir.

In 2016, India experienced some 929 attacks which claimed 340 deaths averaging 0.4 deaths/attack but the number is still significantly lower than the other most terrorism-impacted countries those averaged 2.7 deaths/attack.

On deaths from terrorism chart, deaths in India (340) are even scarcer than the deaths in Democratic Republic of Congo (479) and South Sudan (472) – both excluded from 2017 GTI top-10 most impacted countries from terrorism.

But the number of attacks (929) favored India to limelight – majority of those were least lethal or more discriminate and did not result in any deaths and the report itself clarifies ‘This discrepancy between the number of attacks and deaths reflect how the nature of terrorism in India differs when compared to other countries’.

So India must be excluded from the list of most impacted countries from terrorism since Kashmir struggle for plebiscite under UN resolution and Maoists/Naxalite drive against inequality and injustice are the result of international community total failure to insert its role on dispute resolution and providing basic human rights to asphyxiated people in India.

US Drawing Out of Global War on Terror

By: Azhar Azam

The cost of war could never be calculated – the emotions shattered could never be measured – the relations detached could never be refilled – the misery of an orphan could never be sensed – the feelings of a widow could never be expressed – and the sacrifice of the son, brother, father or husband could never be weighed.

Though it is not possible to convey the human toll in the wars on terror in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan but what is calculable are the ledgers, financial burdens and offence allocations or expenditures which could give an idea of devastation incurred.

Since 9/11, a number of international, regional and territorial wars and conflicts have been kindled – shadily nearly all in selective Asian regions. Starting from US-led coalition forces attacks on Iraq, Afghanistan – later tugging Pakistan into war – and then to ongoing Middle East chaos, everywhere the number of casualties is myriad.

As these wars and operations have been triggered by the United States directly or indirectly – it has to make huge on account of weapons, destruction then reconstructions, logistics, pays, interests and medical etc.

According to a study for Department of Defense released in July 2017, American taxpayers are estimated to pay a total of $1.52 trillion at an average of $7,740 for US wars on terror in Afghanistan (3,785) and Iraq/Syria ($3,955) through FY2018.



Federation of American Scientists (FAS) has also obtained a DOD report through Secrecy News that lists US costs of war has exceeded $1.46 trillion as of June 2017 – showing US wars expenditure of $253.6 million per day.

Professor Neta C. Crawford research paper revealed this month estimates that the actual costs of war are much higher through FY2017 – $1.88 trillion at per month average expenditure of $320.3 million in these war zones.

US began global war on terror in October 2001 alongside war against Afghan Taliban and Al-Qaida in Afghanistan. It launched war against Iraq in March 2003 and later expanded it to Syria in August 2014. Pentagon baptized various war missions with different names.

Operation Freedom’s Sentinel (OFS) – train, advise, and assist mission to Afghan security forces – began on January 1, 2015 in Afghanistan (incl. operations in Pakistan) after formally ending Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) – combat mission – which lasted for over 13 years – October 7, 2001 to December 31, 2014.

Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR) – military air power intervention – began in August 2014 in Iraq and Syria. Earlier it launched Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) – military action – that ran from March 19, 2003 to August 31, 2010. War in Iraq continued under Operation New Dawn (OND) till December 2011 before renamed into Post-Operation New Dawn (P-OND). With the inclusion of Syria, it is now known as OIR.

Eventually US have formally ended combat missions in Afghanistan and have also limited its military operations in Iraq and Syria to solitary air strikes.

Operation Noble Eagle (ONE) was started on September 14, 2001 attacks and is the military operation related to homeland security and providing support to federal, state, and local agencies after 9/11 attacks.

Prof. Crawford lists various hidden outlays that cracks the US war costs incredibly. He estimates that the total US spending on Global War on Terror (GWOT), Homeland Security, Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs since the 9/11 attacks has already exceeded $4.3 trillion through FY2017.

An additional $281 billion is estimated to be spent by the US (excluding Pakistan) through FY2018 – ramming total cost of wars to over $4.6 trillion.

That goes on to corroborate that the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria would essentially charge each American taxpayer a total of $22,120 or US economy $755 million per day through FY2018.

The report also calculates an additional $1,000 billion spending on account of future obligations for GWOT Veterans Medical and Disability for 2019-2016.

One must not be confused with $877.4 billion war appropriation to Afghanistan that includes Pakistan Coalition Support Fund (CSF). CSF is a reimbursement to Pakistan for military operations conducted against Taliban and Al-Qaida on behalf of the US and is just a fraction of total amount – $14.5 billion.

CSF to Pakistan so as the other aids to several countries is appropriation only – final obligations and disbursements are much lower than these appropriations as reference document verifies too. For example, the US appropriated $742 million, obliged $142 million and spent only $130 million on foreign assistance to Pakistan in FY2017.

Professor explains the point on Page 11 and confirms that the US disbursed and compensated Pakistan for using ports, overland transportation of food, fuel, and military equipment, providing logistical support for its forces, manning observation posts on Pak-Afghan border, conducting maritime interdiction operations, and combat air patrols.

On the other side, US global war on terror has charged Pakistan’s economy direct and indirect losses of nearly $120 billion from 2002 to 2016 besides maiming death toll of nearly 80,000 in GWOT including innocent people, armed and other law enforcing agencies personnel.

Consequently the report opines that these massive costs of wars are likely to cost tens of thousands of jobs, affect US ability to invest in infrastructure, increased interests costs on borrowings leading to greater overall Federal indebtness.

Based on DOD current contingencies $120 billion (FY2017) on account of two major international missions – Operation Freedom’s Sentinel (OFS) in Afghanistan and Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR) in Iraq and Syria – Professor’s estimate of $70 billion for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) and US troops’ withdrawal from all the three countries (except for tactical troops’ increase in Afghanistan) accentuate that the United States is gradually drawing out of its own-waged Global War on Terror (GWOT).

Trump's Troops increase will make No Difference to War in Afghanistan

Meeting of NATO Ministers of Defense - Brussels, Belgium

By: Azhar Azam

You may win a war with limited financial and weaponry resources but you can never win it without valiant and resolute combat forces – an instinct NATO misses critically in Afghanistan.

After a meeting of NATO defense ministers in Brussels, the commander of NATO-led coalition in Afghanistan General John Nicholson once again called the allies to contribute more troops for the war against Afghan Taliban and other insurgent groups.

The General further briefed the reporters that the entire ‘uplift’ of the American troops committed by Trump has reached in Afghanistan which will make total U.S. troop strength to 14,500 in the country. Besides military personnel, a total of 15,000 U.S. civilian contractors are also working in Afghanistan.

Of 11,000 U.S. troops deployed earlier in Afghanistan under Operation Freedom’s Sentinel (OFS) – nearly 5,000 troops are on a NATO Resolute Support (RS) mission to train, advise, and assist Afghan security forces. Nearly 7,000 troops from 39 NATO and non-NATO nations are helping them on this undertaking.

The additional 3,000 U.S. military personnel, sent as reinforcement, will also join RS mission – not combat forces and will serve in advisory roles only. Other NATO nations would also be sending their troops only for RS mission. Neither the U.S. nor NATO members’ troops are on a combat mission in Afghanistan.

U.S. troops’ level in Afghanistan reached peak in when the troops’ tally equaled 110,325 in 2011 before gradual withdrawal in later years.

Nicholson plea comes at a time when the war-torn country is experiencing a sadistic 2017 and Afghan Taliban are growing their control in the country. As of August 2017, Over 33% of the area in 407 districts of Afghanistan are either under Taliban control or being contested, according to the latest SIGAR report.

As of 30-September-2017, the United States has obligated $44.4 billion and disbursed $43.3 billion to train, equip, build, and sustain the Afghan Security Forces (ASF). As of 2017, Congress appropriations for Afghanistan security totaled $70 billion that is 60% of total reconstructing funds and four-times of U.S. World War II restructuring costs.

Another $48 billion was requested for war spending in Afghanistan during FY2018 by U.S Department of Defense – reaching cumulative war expenditure in Afghanistan to nearly $916 billion through FY2001-2018. United States’ war-related expenditure is projected to exceed $5.6 trillion through FY2001-2018.

But this massive spending could not prevent to control 6,769 ASF casualties including 2,531 killings in the first four months of 2017. Instead, Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF) assigned strength declined by 9,000-persons in this quarter – to about 320,000.

On the front of civilian casualties, Secretary James Mattis itemized that in ‘recent months, there have been fewer civilian casualties as a result of Coalition operations’. But UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) disagrees.

According to a recent report, UNAMA documented 8,019 civilian casualties in first nine months of 2017 – 6% decrease in as compared to same period in 2016. Despite this decease, the mission noted a 52% increase in civilian casualties through aerial strikes by Coalition forces for the same nine-month period.

In the contextual of these deadly circumstances in Afghanistan, the other North Atlantic Treaty Organization member countries have been cautious to raise troops’ level in Afghanistan – a kind of response General Nicholson seemed to be quite concerned about.

Invoked after 9/11 attacks, article 5 of the treaty requires the fellow countries to come and aid any of the member country in the event of any armed attack – considering it an attack on all. Troops in Afghanistan were deployed under this proviso.

But the prolonged war in Afghanistan has watered the applicability of this stipulation now as a number of military posts are lying vacant in the battle-weary country since last year – adding on to the frustration to the United States.

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that the new number is yet to be finalized – revealing ‘still have some gaps’ and acknowledging to facing a problem in filling up the hundreds of military vacancies in Afghanistan.

Sore to the wish of the United States, key NATO troops’ contributor, Germany refused to lift its troops’ level for the coming year. ‘The commitments received so far are sufficient. We will not reach the total troop level but to a high degree’, said German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen.

United States and the other NATO member countries are clearly reluctant to deploy combat forces in Afghanistan to avoid troops’ casualties. This is why; Trump administration is using pressure tactics on Pakistan to somehow persuade it for military engagement in Afghanistan.

The recent statement by General Nicholson ‘no change in Pakistan behavior’ is part of this tactical move. But Pakistan is rightly conceiving the NATO ambitious plan and is sensibly evading any step that could undermine peace and stability in its country.

Consequently the more U.S. and NATO troops are not going to change the overall trajectory of war in Afghanistan as the recent troops’ increase is non-combative stride – except for air strikes and for just assisting, advising, and supporting the Afghan security forces battling with the insurgents.

Additionally, if NATO cannot achieve ‘objectives’ in Afghanistan with constant military deployment of up to 150,000 troops in 16 years of war – how could it is going to get there with a few thousands of them?

Unless, the U.S. and other NATO partners engage in direct war against Taliban – the dream of winning in Afghanistan will remain a dream.

Why $110 billion US-Saudi Defense Deal is a Fib?

By: Azhar Azam

On his first stop to his first foreign trip in May this year, President Trump signed various defense ‘contracts’ of nearly $110 billion with his counterpart, King Salman.

The massive deals stormed all sorts of media – talk shows were shrieking, analysis were steered, editorials were published, posts were spammed, memes were shared, and trends were set – without gaging the essentials of US or global arms trade.

Pentagon press release cites the deal as defense capabilities package that will be conveyed through Foreign Military Sales (FMS). These deals are mostly letters of intent or offer based on ‘potential’ future needs of Saudi Arabia over a period of time.

Underlining the global arms trade, US arms exports, and Saudi arms imports and its economy vulnerability due to falling oil pricing; the financial value of these defense ‘agreements’ is clearly enormously overstated by Trump administration.

According to Congressional Research Service report, worldwide arms agreements, to both developed and developing countries, totaled just $79.9 billion in 2015 – up from $71.8 billion in 2014.

The noted report tables that total value of arms agreements with developing nations in 2015 was $65.2 billion – up from $61.8 billion in 2014. Whereas the total value of arms deliveries to developing nations in 2015 was $33.6 billion – up from $20.6 billion in 2014.

In 2015, United States’ (#1 arms exporter) total arms deliveries were $16.9 billion ahead of Russia ($7.2 billion) and France ($7.0 billion) whereas Saudi Arabia was the third-largest recipient of arms deliveries (imports) worth of $4.5 billion behind Egypt ($5.3 billion) and Iraq ($5.0 billion).

Similarly in 2014, Saudi Arabia ($4.2 billion) was the second largest arms importer behind India ($5.5 billion) and ahead of Iraq ($3.4 billion). United States ($12.2 billion), Russia ($9.2 billion), and France ($5.1 billion) were the largest arms suppliers to the world for the year.

Overall during 2008 to 2015, Saudi Arabia basically spent a total of just $30.7 billion in 8-years at an average of $3.8 billion per year on arms purchased against total arms purchase agreements of $93.5 billion for the same period.

In the first nine months of 2017 (January to September), the US foreign military sales (FMS) notifications totaled just $31.5 billion – despite almost doubling it $17.7 billion for the same period in last year, according to Security Assistance Monitor.

Five months into the largest defense pact, US proposed arms sales to Saudi Arabia could grow by just $2 billion – from $1.6 billion to $3.6 billion for January to September. Again, the value refers to ‘proposed sales’ and not sales concluded.

The factsheet further avers that United States would be selling more arms to Japan ($6.6 billion), Canada ($5.8 billion), Romania ($$5.2 billion), and Bahrain ($4.0) billion than the most-chanted Saudi Arabia.

And recalling that the financial realization of actual arms deliveries inevitably much lesser than the value of US arms sales notifications; the reality to bragging billions of dollars and thousands of jobs exposes blatantly.

SIPRI Arms Transfers Database is another platform that tracks and provides all transfers of major conventional weapons. The conflict and weapons transfers’ watchdog estimates that the volume of global arms trade in 2015 was $91.3 billion.

In 2016, although United States remained the star in major arms supply to world but total value of its exports stood $9.9 billion and likewise Saudi Arabia was the leading major weapons importer in the same year nonetheless it purchase value did not exceed $3.0 billion.

The multiple arms data sources sum up that the United States is highly exaggerating the $110 billion defense deals with Saudi Arabia – that also includes about $25 billion agreements signed in Obama term.

Saudi Arabia is aggressively implementing its Vision 2030 that maps to diversify its economy, easing onerous reliance on oil and focus on domestic spending including over 50% spending on domestic arms production, research, and development.

Contrariwise, the Trump administration is playing politically to rationalize his election-campaign’s promises to create and bring jobs back home – as immediately the defense stocks scaled up after the raining dollars newscasts from Saudi Arabia.

Fake Friend to Former Foe: Pakistan Distancing from America to Embrace Russia

By: Azhar Azam

Mi35M Helicopter

In flurry of US radical spells over Pakistan discounting the country’s unprecedented support on terrorism across areas – Pakistan continues to take protective measures to distance itself from a fitful ally United States and warming up its to former foe Russia.

In a recent development, 70 mountain shooters from Pakistan armed forces arrive in Russia to conduct second consecutive bilateral military drills, dubbed as Druzhba 2017 or Дружба 2017 (Friendship 2017). The tactical exercise will include a total of 200 personnel from both the countries.

The 2-weeks joint defense exercises will start from September 24 through October 4 in a mountainous area near Nizhny Arkhyz. More than 100 troops from Russian military mountain riffle brigade will also attend the armed maneuvers comprising over 20 mountain war drills at an altitude of up to 2.3 thousand meters above the sea level.

Meanwhile, Pakistan army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa will also be visiting Moscow in the first week of October 2017. The General’s first-ever trip as army chief is spotted vital in wake of building a ‘substantial partnership’ especially in the field of military cooperation and also in the backdrop of the new strategic alliances in the region.

Pakistan has been leaning toward Russia for the past few years after US abrupt curve to India to stem the China’s growing influence in the region. On the other hand, Indian stony behavior riled Russia – forcing Moscow to redesign its policy amid major policy shifts in South-East Asia.

Last year, Russia not only regretted Indian plea to include Pakistan a terror-sponsor country in BRICS declaration, Goa but also declined to abort military exercises (Friendship 2016) in the aftermath of Uri attacks.

Russia, together with China, helped Pakistan and tiled the way for Islamabad’s membership of Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and also keenly participated in Pakistan defense and military exhibition, IDEAS-2016 (Arms for Peace).

Responding to Trump’s newly unveiled Afghan policy that slammed Pakistan, Russian special envoy to Afghanistan panned US – pronouncing Pakistan a key regional player to negotiate with’ and urged it must not be pressurized that may seriously destabilize peace in region.

Just recently, Russia delivered four (4) Mi-35M helicopters destined at military-to-military relations between Islamabad and Moscow. Russian Mi-35M choppers are most likely to replace part of Pakistan’s aging military fleet of US AH-1 Cobra attack helicopters.

Director Coordination DEPO, Major General Waheed Mumtaz confirmed the Russian daily in Moscow on Friday at International Military-Technical Forum (Army 2017). ‘The contract was signed, we received all four cars and now we get new equipment.’

Pakistani pilots are adapting to the new helicopters and based on the performance of gunships, Pakistan can order additional military equipment and platforms to Russia – General further noted. According to some reports, Pakistan could purchase up to a total of 20-units from Russia.

The deal upshots after high level military delegation visit to Kremlin in June 2015 led by the-army chief General Raheel Sharif. Sharif has been at an arms expo near Moscow and seemingly was very impressive while inspecting of the weapon systems and live demonstrations.

Mi-35M is a latest variant of Mi-24V Hind by ROSOBORONEXPOR and can be multi-tasked in attacks, troops-carrying, transport, and ambulance (medevac) versions. The latest inclusion will greatly boost Pakistan’s military capability and develop its close air support (CAS) requirements in counter-insurgency (COIN) operations.

The helicopter is equipped with a powerful onboard weapon system – a flexible mount (with 450 rounds), up to 80 unguided rockets, up to 8 anti-tank guided missiles, and 12.7mm Kord machine guns. It best harmonizes for mountainous terrains and can be deployed ‘round the clock’ in adverse weather conditions.

‘The Barq laser-guided air-to-ground missile (AGM) produced by the National Engineering and Scientific Corporation (NESCOM) for use by the Burraq armed drone could be an ATGM/AGM option for the Mi-35M’, according to Quwa.

The Defense News and Analysis Group also highlights some reports about Pakistan’s interest in Russian defense systems such as Su-35 Flanker-E, Mi-28NE Night Hunter, and S-400 Triump as well as negotiating full maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) facilities for Mi-35 helicopters, and Klimov RD-93 turbofan engines to slacken its reliance on US-made military equipment.

Impotent United Nations

By: Azhar Azam

Every year large numbers of rampage killers, conspiracy theorists and anarchists gather at United National General Assembly (UNGA)-New York to edify the importance of pacifism, harmony and tolerance with shrill humbug before going back to their countries to resume the same obscenity and atrocities.

The magnitude of this vain annual assembly session is such unsavory that some countries – after tattling shallow statements to denounce human rights violations and stressing the need of dialogue to bringing peace – go back to carry on bullying millions around the world.

It is whether weepy Palestinians, persecuted Kashmiries, Syrian genocide, gruesome Afghanistan, Iraqi fallout, Libyan cataclysm or stateless roaming Rohingyas – United Nations has chronically failed to prevent Israeli, Indian, Russian, United States, and Burmese endless oppression on tearful men, women, and children.

And for some reasons, the victims of all these havoc are manifestly the Muslims and UN or other peace-keeping missions conserve criminal silence – not only ridiculing its fake resolutions but also to truly fuel such conflicts to mushroom brutalities.

If it East Timor, Scotland and Ukraine – suddenly this impotent forum is activated so as the international human rights bodies are galvanized – demanding and forcing to implement “equal and non-discriminatory” rights regardless of nationality, sex, ethnicity, color, religion or language through peaceful and sustainable dialogue.

But when it comes to the most-persecuted people in Palestine, Kashmir, and Rohingya/Arakan – instead putting pressure on hostile countries to enter into a constructive dialogue and pacify the tense situation to impede the mayhem – firewood is supplied to further blaze the conflict flames by silencing on occupying countries’ growing aggression on helpless people.

This attitude indeed directs to hypocrisy, duplicitous and outrageous behavior of the United Nations.

United Nations (UN) says 7 in 10 Palestinians killed in Gaza are civilians. In another report published by United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), Palestine death toll declared highest in 2014 since 1967. It goes on to note that due to summer 2014 hostilities in the Gaza strip known as Operation Protective Edge more than 2,220 Palestinians, including 1,492 civilians lost their lives, 513 of which were children.

In Bosnia-Herzegovina, known as Srebrenica Genocide, according to International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), the war claimed 200,000 lives and at its worst point, uprooted half the population of 4 million. It also included 12,000 children, app. 50,000 women raped and 2.2 million were forced to flee their homes.

Similarly, in Kashmir there have been endless atrocities by the Indian army killing more than one hundred thousand of people, tens of thousands disappeared and huge number women raped. In recent turmoil, over 100-Kashmiris have been killed and dozens have lost their eyesight due to use of pallet guns by Indian forces.

In Syria, reportedly more than 200,000 people are dead including thousands of children since 2012 and the many more to be added to the tally as Russia continues to strike opponent militia to patronize Assad regime.

Likewise, in a recent installment of state-terrorism in Rakhine-Myanmar; nearly 400,000 Rohingya Muslims have been forced to flee. People including children and women are burnt alive; being stabbed and killed as well as rape victims have grown immensely under rule of Aung San Suu Kyi, the Nobel laureate.

Operation GLADIO

It seems as the Operation Gladio “stay behind” is still active today and this time it targets Muslim countries. It is a kind of paramilitary “Pseudo Gang” covert operation which intends to destroy a city, country, and a region from within.

“The idea of “Pseudo Gang” is to murder innocent civilians and then blame the murders on the people that the military wants to discredit.” “The pseudo gang works for the military but pretends to be a bunch of terrorists.”

Society of Jesus and Jesuits

There is also “Society of Jesus”, the members of which are called Jesuits, a Roman Catholic order of religious men founded by St. Ignatius of Loyala. It is an only-male organization and Superior General of the Society of Jesus (J.S) is Black Pope (dresses in black).

Black Pope is considered to be “the-most powerful man” on the earth who “controls Maritime Laws (Business), Banking System, Freemasonry and the Secret Services (CIA, FBI, NSA, SIS, MI6, Scotland Yard, Mossad, CSIS, DGSE, FSB). “The Vatican owns 60% of all Israel lands and the Land of the Temple Mount for their Solomon’s Temple”.”

Many of world organizations including the United Nations, NATO, European Commission, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), various central banks and big corporations, are said to be controlled under Jesuits Order. The Holy See (Vatican organization) participates as an observer in African Union, Arab League, Council of Europe, OAS (35-States of the Americas), International Organization of Migration (IOM), and United Nations (US) and its number of agencies:

FAO (food and agriculture), ILO (labor), UNCTAD (trade and investment), UNEP (environment), UNESCO (education, science, and culture), UN-HABITAT (human settlements), UNHCR (refugees), UNIDO (industry), UNWTO (tourism), WFP (food programs), WHO (health), WIPO (patents, copyrights, and trademarks), ECOSOC (economy), UNFPA (population and reproduction), UNODC (drugs control), and UNDPI (public information). “The Vatican-Jesuit Military Operation That Rules The World: No And If’s or Buts”

The Knights of Malta and Blackwater

The Knights of Malta is the militia of the Pope sworn to total obedience by a blood oath and even to the death. Also known as Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM), The Order of Malta has ambassadors or diplomatic representatives in more than eighty countries, and enjoys Permanent Observer status at the United Nations General Assembly.

Blackwater, the so-called security firm, has historic links with the Order of Malta but neither the Blackwater is just a security firm nor the Knights of Malta is merely a charitable organization. In fact, Blackwater is a religious organization controlled through the Order of Malta reporting directly to the Pope and above and beyond US laws, as the name SMOM elaborates. “Blackwater - The Knights of Malta”

Jordanian MP Jamal Muhamad Abidat describes the role of this organization during the Crusades and now in the Middle East, “the so-called security firms in Iraq such as Blackwater have historic links with the Order of Malta”.

John F. Kennedy, murdered on November 22, 1963, spoke about Secret Society on April 27, 1961: “The very word secrecy is repugnant, in a free and open society. For we are, as people, inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret proceedings, and to secret oaths”…“Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.”

Body Count of the War on Terror-Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan

Moreover, a study conducted by Physicians for Social Responsibility (PCR) in published in March 2015 “Body Count of the War on Terror-Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan” reveals that the war has directly or indirectly killed 1-million people in Iraq, 220,000 in Afghanistan and 80,000 in Pakistan. The study further reports that this figure is nearly 10-times greater than that of media and major NGOs and this is just a conservative estimate as the total body count in these three countries could be 2-million.

The article published on August 3, 2015 in Mint Press News even shocking death toll since US War on Terror’ after 9/11 with the title “Do the Math: Global War on Terror has killed 4-million Muslims or more”.

Stephen M. Walt, Professor of International Relations at Harvard wrote in foreign policy in 2009:

“How many Muslims has the United States killed in the past thirty years, and how many Americans have been killed by Muslims? Coming up with a precise answer to this question is probably impossible, but it is also not necessary, because the rough numbers are so clearly lopsided.”