April 11, 2023

World has had enough of US imperial crusades

By: Azhar Azam

The "liberal" West has a fundamental problem: it cannot tolerate any "unacceptable" perspective reach the people. Last year's Athens Democracy Forum was one of those instances when Jeffrey Sachs called America a "slave-owning, genocidal country, killing Native Americans for a white culture."

"You can be democratic at home and ruthlessly imperial abroad. The most violent country in the world since 1950 has been the United States," said professor and director of the Centre for Sustainable Development at Columbia and his free speech was shockingly shut down under thundering clapping.

After the fall of the Soviet Union, the Middle East has been the biggest victim of the US undying love for unopposed world dominance. America in the first Gulf War obliterated Iraq and then placed sanctions on Baghdad. These crippling sanctions on the war-devastated country threw millions into living a miserable life and led to countless deaths, including children.

Still former secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who helped place sanctions and referred to as "a passionate force for freedom, democracy and human rights," believed this price of killing the children was "worth it." Former US president Donald Trump in September 2020 would publicly admit to killing hundreds of thousands of people in the Middle East.

The US Central Intelligence Agency itself has been involved in serious human rights violations. There were reports of the CIA-sponsored militias’ human rights abuses in Afghanistan and possible war crimes; very few cases have been investigated or prosecuted. The secretive unit's Special Activities Division of paramilitary officers, reported in 2017, has a global field of mission.

Since the end of the World War II, the US has been casting countries such as Cuba, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Libya as anti-America or anti-West to justify its direct invasions or covert interventions. The phrase "Arsenal of Democracy," coined by US president Franklin Roosevelt in 1940 and sought to produce more weapons, laid the foundation of this US post-World War II addiction.

Efforts are being exerted to pump new life into Roosevelt’s doctrine – through which he forged an alliance with the Soviet Union, despite calling it a "dictatorship as absolute as any other dictatorship in the world" and vowed to supply weapons to the USSR against Nazi Germany – to defeat Russia and deter China.

This shows why America isn't sending arms to Ukraine for it is a democracy or to wants to "bolster the defenses of the free and open liberal order", but because the US is finding an opportunity in the Ukrainian conflict to remodel its wars on the basis of democracy versus autocracy transform countries such as Israel into America's "valuable hubs" to reassert its global hegemony.

In order to implement this frenzied agenda, inflation is being downplayed to focus on growth, investment and modernization – not to help the embattled Americans – instead to install new industrial facilities, raise arms production and push war spending so that America may deploy more resources against China and Russia. Emails from Pentagon officials to defense contractors and the surge in late-night pizza deliveries to the Department of Defense are restlessly awaited.

Most stories, statements and strategies of the US media, American officials and the Biden administration – to frame China as a threat to the West – are either melodramatic or farcical. The same nexus, which destroyed country after country, is disseminating lies and falsehoods about China with an irresistible impulse to start a Cold War.

Under this concept, the US government and media acted in concert to peddle misleading reports and testimonies, especially Iraq and others and NATO backed these disastrous wars. But this military adventure against China will have far more grievous consequences given Beijing is deeply integrated into the global economy and has bolstered its military and industrial strength while the "Arsenal of Democracy" peters out and the US and NATO stockpiles deplete fast over protracted Ukraine war.

NATO’s enlargement lies at the heart of the Ukraine crisis. Even as US security doesn't depend on the military alliance’s expansion rather poses threats of direct confrontation, it's prepared to take risks just to restore its world dominance. The Biden's administration's sabotage of negotiation, as Sachs pointed out, and supply of arms to Ukraine is described as a "real leadership" while peace talks may help to avert the risk of escalation and a nuclear war.

Biden's belief not to end the war through negotiation and use the Ukraine crisis as a way to pursue his foreign policy goals has been patently obvious of late. In October, when some 30 progressive Democrats warned the Ukraine war had “attendant certainties and catastrophic consequences and unknowable risks” and urged him to adopt a "proactive diplomatic push," consistent with his own conviction on a negotiated settlement, they were cowered in humiliation and forced to rescind their call for diplomacy.

Through decades, US foreign wars have killed hundreds of thousands indiscriminately, forced millions to flee, bulldozed international law and committed human rights violations and war crimes across regions in addition to razing critical public infrastructure such as schools, farms, hospitals and other infrastructure. Wars remained “the American way of life” to project power and expand influence; it continues to be the core of the US foreign policy to reestablish its world hegemony in the guise of freedom and liberty.

As the US gears up to stockpile weapons and aims to aggravate tensions between countries without directly involving itself in conflicts, the world neither needs America to be the "Arsenal of Democracy" nor does it see the future of the world order at risk. The world at large and the Middle East in particular have had enough of the US imperial crusades and will not support an ideological war at the cost of global peace.

*This is one of my articles that first appeared in "The China Daily"

April 8, 2023

US grand strategy in Asia-Pacific

By: Azhar Azam

Asia-Pacific is the US “priority theatre of operations” and lies at the heart of America’s grand strategy to assert global hegemony. The US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin last year outlined the region as “center of strategic gravity” to gang up regional states against China, while trying to claim Washington wasn’t splitting the region into hostile blocs.

The Biden administration still contends it doesn’t want competition with China to veer into a conflict; the US officials continue to accuse China of taking aggressive actions and tempting Asia-Pacific countries with a delusive “gravitational pull of freedom.” Within this grand strategy, the US intelligence community alleges China of dominating the region, driving wedges between America and its partners and extending Chinese influence, particularly in East Asia and the western Pacific while itself conducting military exercises around the sensitive regional waterways.

An explicit intent is to rally allies under the pretense of deterrence and protection against China, contain Beijing’s rise and reinstate the US role as the world’s sole superpower. Japan’s major shift from a pacifist nation to a menacing force, signaling the biggest military posture since World War II, is welcomed and praised because the unprecedented defense budget increase will boost arms production and profit the US military-industrial complex.

Contrarily, China’s defense spending at $224 billion is dwarfed by the US Department of Defense budget of more than $1.7 trillion for the fiscal year 2023, which focuses on executing aggressive military plans and operations. In addition, America is a consistent threat to the region’s peace and stability as it has the largest aviation force in Asia-Pacific with more than half of its fighter planes comprising fourth or fifth generation models.

Former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo last year suggested America must make “three lighthouses of liberty” (Israel, China’s Taiwan region and Ukraine) the hubs of new security architecture in the Middle East, East Asia and Europe and link these bastions with NATO and the new and expanded security framework of Asia-Pacific to form a “global alliance for freedom.”

His concept may hasn’t officially been endorsed by the Biden administration; it has increased Europe’s security dependence on the US, pitted Mideast countries against each other and is trying to take advantage of the Ukraine crisis to mend its frayed relations with its partners in Asia-Pacific. Washington is doing so by stoking tensions and increasing arms sales to regional states as well as reinvigorating the four-nation Quad and the trilateral AUKUS alliances not just to encircle China but to impose its leadership on the region.

Yet the strategy is backfiring. China’s emergence as a peace-broker between Saudi Arabia and Iran is shattering America’s great plan; the US efforts to use the Ukraine conflict as a conduit to restore its global hegemony is challenged by some wealthy, powerful and democratic US allies that have maintained their autonomy.

Given regional organizations such as Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the African Union are focused on regional development rather than catching “fever” of the US fixation with China, other Asia-Pacific states will be cautious of aligning too closely with Washington and may pursue an independent foreign policy.

The framing of competition with China by Republican Mike Gallagher, chairman of the House China Task Force, as an “existential struggle” is both misguided and risky. The committee “forged out of paranoia (and) hysteria” which tends to get locked into groupthink and xenophobic mindset as the US “actively” seeks to contain China and derail its technological progress. This approach will inevitably escalate tensions between China and the US and make engagement even more difficult.

Communication channels between the two militaries froze after China-US relations ebbed over America’s hyperboles on the balloon saga. The US defense officials dubbed the lack of communication as “destabilizing and dangerous” yet by calling off the US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s trip to China, shooting down a Chinese object with a missile, planting NATO clones such as the Quad and the AUKUS in Asia-Pacific, the US has exposed its petty-minded approach to circumscribe China and its inclination to shutter communication channels.

The Biden administration has clearly set out its ambition, which is to implement the 2022 National Defense Strategy to tackle the “pacing challenge” from China. As part of this strategy, a US-led systematic campaign is underway to attribute false threats to China with claims of Southeast Asian states likely to become “wearier participants” in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

But there’s a catch: the US Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, the means to advance the US Indo-Pacific Strategy, is more of a showpiece for it actually delivers very little to the region, especially to ASEAN. In contrast, Chinese infrastructure and development projects such as the BRI and the Global Development Initiative are lionized by regional states, indicating Asia-Pacific doesn’t want to become an avenue of a great power competition.

At the first anniversary of the Indo-Pacific Strategy, the Biden administration’s primary focus remains the Quad and the AUKUS, both of which take frequent mentions in the latest State Department’s report. But in Southeast Asia, nations have never greeted the military alliances with skepticism. They have criticized AUKUS for its propensity to trigger arms races in the region and remained concerned about these anti-peace and provocative security partnerships. As a result, the US grand strategy is condemned to failure.

*This is one of my articles that also appeared at CGTN, Express Tribune, New Straits Times, Global Village Space and Global Research.