September 27, 2018

Trump: Make America Trail Again

By: Azhar Azam

China’s strict trade policies – to enforce foreign companies to set up factories in and transfer technology in China – is the real point of tiff between the largest developed and largest developing countries of the world.

Trump administration accuses these China’s acts as theft of American intellectual property and forced transfer of American technology – hence it oozed several punitive steps that cuff additional tariffs on imports from China.

In a White House statement, Trump warned China if it takes retaliatory actions against our farmers and other industries, we shall immediately pursue Phase-III, which to tariff on approximately $267 of additional imports.

But China didn’t dither to hit back and enacted tariffs on goods imports from the United States.

For the first seven months of 2018, the United States trade deficit in goods with China averaged $31.8 billion per month to $222.6 billion, largest-ever as compared to per monthly trade deficit of $31.3 billion in 2017, to $375.6 billion.

The trade war between the two economic powerhouses is getting stiffer and trickier after the imposition of US sanctions on China over purchase of Russia Su-35 fighter jets and S-400 air missile defense systems.

United States plugged the sanctions on the Equipment Development Department of the Central Military Commission of China in violation to ‘Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA).

Chinese military intoned its ‘strong indignation and resolute opposition’ on sanctions and demanded the United States ‘to immediately correct its wrongdoing and withdraw the so-called sanctions’ or ‘must bear the consequences’.

The burly China’s response is unusual. It normally circumvents using such a rude tongue on international diplomatic forums or even to its contenders. So, the Chinese tough-tone is clearly an indication that it is prepared for trade war escalation.

On the other hand, the United States has entirely or partially sanctioned a number of economic or military giants such as China, Russia, Turkey, Iran, Pakistan, and North Korea. It is also threatening to impose sanctions on oil-rich Venezuela.

This unprecedented American global supremacy is driven by its enormous economic and military strength and most importantly by the broad acceptance of its currency – US dollar – as world’s leading reserve currency.

For many years, the US dollar is shouldering the largest share in IMF’s international currency basket – COFER. It currently forms 62.48% or about $6.5 trillion of the allocated global official foreign exchange reserves.

Nevertheless, the share of US dollar has slid to four-year low, from peak 65.97% in 2015. At the same time, the other major currencies such as euro, Japanese yen, pound sterling, and Chinese renminbi/yuan have bettered their shares.

While the economic US ‘titanic’ is also holed by massive military spending and overseas operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria – the ‘victimized’ countries are targeting the trademark US$ currency.

In order to end their reliance and end the global supremacy of US dollar, the aggrieved countries are now running anti-dollar campaign, encouraging the use of local currencies in international trade.

Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) and China Development Bank (CDB) are closely coordinating to increase the ruble-yuan trade between the two countries, in defiance to hegemony of US dollar.

The first deals (in national currencies) will transpire in the start of the next year in Chinese yuan worth $10 billion. The initiative would be milestone in $100 billion bilateral trade – potential to reach $200 billion – between the two countries.

China is the world’s largest oil importer and also is the largest Russia’s oil buyer. Russia has agreed to accept Chinese yuan against oil supply instead of petrodollar. So, both China and Russia are set to disrupt the $1.7 trillion petrodollar market.

Furthermore, China is pushing its other oil trade partners – Saudi Arabia, Angola, and Iran – to trade oil for yuan. The ‘petroyuan’ contracts are expected to surge as soon as American sanctions continue to take effect on China.

Turkey too is aggressively pursuing for non-dollar transactions in trade and investment with Russia and other countries after Turkish lira shed by 40% in this year over strenuous Turkey-US relations.

The ties between the United States and Turkey hit all-time low, following Trump imposed extortionate sanctions on Turkish steel and aluminum over detention of an American pastor on terrorism charges.

US Senate showed great resentments against Turkey and passed a bill to stop the supply of F-25 jets on the Turkish announcement of purchasing S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems from Russia.

Erdogan responded averring that Turkey does not need permission from anyone to guard its territory.

He further said that the United States was behaving like ‘wild wolves’ and urged the need to gradually end the monopoly of American dollars once for all. Turkey is now in negotiations with Russia to layover the use of US dollar in bilateral trade.

In addition to these local currency swaps, China might consider to pull out its substantial holdings in the US treasury. As of July, China retains roughly 20 percent of the total US foreign debt of $6.251 trillion.

It has not made any new purchases for some years now, instead China holdings in US treasury have plunged to six-month low of $1.17 trillion. The occasional rise in China holding is due to interest payments, it has accumulated over the years.

If China decides to sell off its holdings, it would make an impact on interest rates and bond prices. The US government will be forced to issue bonds on higher interest rates to borrowers to meet the dearth that would eventually slowdown the US economy.

Till December 2017, Russia also was one of the top foreign investors in US treasury with $102.2 billion. As its tussle grew with the United States, it sold out its most of its treasuries and now maintains only $14.9 billion in US treasury.

The economies, which are subject to shakeup on US sanctions, are developing their own payment system, as an alternative to SWIFT.

Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) is the world’s largest interbank communication network that enables financial institutions to send and receive reliable, safe, and quick information about financial transactions.

As SWIFT is controlled by the United States, the countries such as China, Russia, France, and Germany are evolving their own international payments system to ensure their autonomy and sovereignty in trade, beyond US control.

China introduced its indigenous international payment system, Cross-border Inter-bank Payment System (CIPS), in October 2015 to provide safe, easy, and efficient settlement services to international financial institutions doing transactions in yuan.

The second phase of CIPS became fully operation in May 2018 and its actual business scope was extended to 148 countries and regions. According to central bank of China, RMB CIPS handled 89.4 billion yuan in the first quarter of 2018.

Russia is toiling on its domestic interbank payment system too – System for Transfer of Financial Messages (SPFS) – smelling the potential shutdown of SWIFT from tougher US sanctions. It may consider euro-yuan based alternatives to SWIFT as well.

Earlier this month, France and Germany announced their own international payment system. French finance minister said ‘with Germany, we are determined to work on an independent European or Franco-German financing tool which would allow us to avoid being the collateral victims of US extra-territorial sanction’.

The United Kingdom, Germany, France, China, and Russia have lately agreed on special payment system on Trump’s unilateral withdrawal from Iran nuclear deal. The payment channel would be analogue to SWIFT for making oil payments to Iran.

All these episodes are ensuing on fast-track and are in retaliation to Trump’s cursory measures to ditch every country to ‘Make America Great Again’ but the in doing so, he could very well ‘Make America Trail Again’.


September 14, 2018

How India is Caught-up between its New and Old Allies?

By: Azhar Azam

Last week, the defense and foreign ministers of India and the United States signed a new pact – Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement (COMCASA) – on the sidelines of the 2+2 dialogue.

Washington describes COMCASA as one of the three routine foundational agreements which it has signed with a number of its allies to facilitate the interoperability between the respective militaries.

Through COMCASA, India will get an access to a more secure communication network system – Combined Enterprise Regional Information Exchange System (CENTRIXS) – which would allow its marine and aerial platforms to get real time location of hostile naval assets deployment in Indo-pacific region.

The bilateral accord has previously been postponed twice after the Trump administration had refused to give India any preferential treatment in its tariff row against various countries. Both the countries also have differences on market access and intellectual property also.

COMCASA is being deliberated as a milestone gait in Indo-US relations but at the same time, it is subject to criticism to many diplomats and experts in India and abroad.

Although it would provide India with the contemporary military information and communication equipment but India remains concerned about revelation of its military assets to Pakistan or other countries, since Washington could monitor Indian communications in operations.

Over the past few years, India has been ambitiously embracing the United States to abate Beijing and Islamabad and to strengthen its ‘unnatural bonds’ with Kabul, without weathering any detriments to its economic, strategic, and trade interests.

The United States apparently has been very supportive in helping India to achieve its strategic goals nevertheless, is seeking some ‘paybacks’ in return while is disinclined to give any waiver to India either on Iran or Russia.

For the past few months, it has been pursuing India to kneel down to its new federal law – Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) – which maps to impose sanctions including two of the Indian closest allies, Iran and Russia.

After Trump pulled out from P5+1 nuclear deal – Joint Comprehensive Plan on Action (JCPoA) – with Iran, the United States has obligated India to reduce oil imports from Iran down to zero by November 4; otherwise it could be exposed to sanctions.

At the conclusion of 2+2 dialogue with India the US foreign secretary Mike Pompeo emphasized that we have told Indians consistently that on November 4, the sanctions on Iranian crude oil will be enforced…or sanctions will be imposed.

Iranian oil is ideally priced for India and it supplements credit provisions too. India is Iran’s second-largest export market however on the back of these US sanctions, Iranian oil import by Indian companies have fallen by about one-third for the last month.

The CAASTA would also impede Indian durable strategic interests in Iran’s Chabahar port since the United States is not willing to give any concession to India on this crucial Indian $500 million strategic investment.

Chabahar has a potential to provide India a new trade link to Afghanistan and Central Asia, bypassing Pakistan routes but the project has been delayed over negotiations on terms between Iran and India.

India has also committed $1.6 billion for a rail-link from Chabahar to Iranian city, Zahedan.

If India fails to get a US waiver for Chabahar port, it would have to sip a more forceful blow to its Afghanistan-China-Pakistan strategic campaigns. And if it flouts the US federal law, it would risk its emergent relations with the United States.

Under CAATSA, any country that is involved in significant transaction with Russia or its intelligence and defense sectors can be imposed five or more of sanctions, described in section 235 of the Act, by the President of the US.

So, the implementation of CAATSA could also jeopardize India’s purchase of S-400 air missile defense systems from Russia. As more than 60% of Indian military equipment is Russian supplied, any sanctions on Russia could terribly affect Indian national security.

The United States is also recapping India the trade surplus, it has been relishing for years. For the last four years, the United States sustained trade deficit of $23.9 billion, $23.4 billion, $24.4 billion, and $22.9 billion with India.

The Trump administration is compelling India to curtail this trade deficit by supplying its oil, gas, and military equipment.

Trump administration has also accused India’s ‘trade-distorting policy’ of providing massive subsidies to its rice and wheat farmers. ‘Every rice or wheat producing country should be concerned about the trade effects of India’s distorting domestic support’, a USTR official told Congress.

So, the US is using its conventional tool of ‘carrot and stick’ policy for India as well where initially it used more carrots to allure India and now gradually mixing some ‘sticks’ to terrify India.

The United States will carry on this policy to gain from massive Indian market and to reinforce India as its proxy against China and Pakistan’s substitute in Afghanistan, so the volume of ‘carrots’ will invariably be more than ‘sticks’.

On the other hand, India is neatly tugged into a place by the US where neither it can annoy America nor can it backtrack to its old allies.

It can neither completely end its reliance on Iranian oil nor can it surrender its strategic interests at Chabahar port. Similarly neither it can abruptly replace its Russian military stockpile nor can it completely end its long-term defense ties with Russia.

As a result, India is caught up between its new – the United States – and old allies – Iran and Russia.


September 5, 2018

70 Pakistani Entities on US Entity List Now


US Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has sanctioned another two (2) Pakistani companies to the Entity List – snowballing the country’s entities’ tally to seventy (70), which are now enlisted in the ‘Rule’.

Trump Administration believes that the companies solicited in the Entity List are involved or to pose a significant risk of being involved in activities contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States.

The End-User Review Committee (ERC) added Technology Links (Pvt.) Ltd. including Techlinks and Techlink Communications to the Entity List based on its involvement in supplying items to nuclear and missile-related entities in Pakistan without license.

It further determined that UEC (Pvt.) Ltd. including Techcare Services FZ LLC made several attempts to acquire US-origin commodities for Pakistan’s nuclear program and have provided false and misleading information to BIS during an end-use check.

These companies will be subject to additional license requirements as well as limitations on license exceptions. The license requirements will be applied to any transaction relating to exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country).

Earlier in March 2018, the department had also added seven (7) companies to the Entity List under the destination from Pakistan.

The companies – Mushko Electronics, Solutions Engineering, Akhtar & Munir, Proficient Engineers, Pervaiz Commercial Trading Co. (PCTC), Marine Systems Ltd., and Engineering and Commercial Services (ECS) – were alleged to procure items on behalf of nuclear-related entities in Pakistan without the required licenses.

The recent burst of US ruses are being prophesied in the backdrop of the its rising frustration in Afghanistan after its ally Afghan government has consistently lost control on Afghan territory and population despite US spending of $687 billion through 2017.

Pakistan foreign office spokesperson had cautioned the United States for ‘unnecessarily politicizing the issue’ and rebuffed attempts of detraction ‘to exploit these listings to cast aspersions on Pakistan’s non-proliferation credentials’.

The press release further stated that ‘Pakistan’s efforts in the area of export controls and non-proliferation as well as nuclear safety and security are well known’.

Here is the complete index of the Entity List which includes seventy (70) companies – excluding two (2) recently added – under the destination from Pakistan, according to US Electronic Code of Regulations (e-CFR) as of August 31, 2018:


1. Abdul Qadir Khan Research Laboratories (AQKRL) and its affiliates;

2. Abdul Sattar Ghoura;

3. Advanced Engineering Research Organization (AERO) – Integrated Solutions;

4. Ahad International;

5. Air Weapons Complex (AWC);

6. Akhtar & Munir;

7. Al-Technique Corporation of Pakistan (ATCOP);

8. Allied Trading Co. – UCB Arcade;

9. ANZ Importers and Exporters;

10. Azad Motors Property Choice and its affiliates;

11. Azam Electronics and its affiliates;

12. Creative Dynamics Engineering – Creative Dynamics;

13. Defense Science and Technology Organization (DEFTO) and its affiliates;

14. Engineering and Commercial Services (ECS);

15. Engineering Solutions Pvt. Ltd.;

16. FACO Trading;

17. Farzad Fazal Karim – Ahmad Farzad;

18. Fazal Rahim Farid and three aliases;

19. Future Systems Pvt. Ltd.;

20. Hakim Noor – Hakim Nur;

21. HakimNur Sarafa and two aliases;

22. High Technologies Ltd. (HTL) – High Technology Ltd.;

23. IKAN Engineering Services – IKAN Sourcing

24. Iman Group – Pana Communication Inc.;

25. Interscan;

26. Irum Mehboob Raja, Pakistan Institute of Nuclear Science & Technology (PINSTECH);

27. Jalaluddin Haqqani and seven aliases;

28. Khalil Zardan and eight aliases;

29. Khalil Zardan Company – Khalil Construction;

30. KMA International Import and Export Co.;

31. Khurshid Ghoura and two aliases;

32. Lapcom Computer Stores;

33. Lastech Associates;

34. LT Engineering and Trade Services Pvt. Ltd. (LTE);

35. Machinery Master Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (MME);

36. Makkays Hi-Tech Systems – Zaib Electronics;

37. Maple Engineering Pvt. Ltd.;

38. Marine Systems Pvt. Ltd.;

39. Maritime Technology Complex (MTC);

40. Micado;

41. Mohammad Azam – Mohammad Akram;

42. MSN International;

43. Muhammad Halim Ghoura;

44. Mushko Electronics Pvt. Ltd.;

45. National Engineering and Scientific Commission (NESCOM);

46. Nazir and Sons International;

47. New Auto Engineering (NAE);

48. Ologh Beg International Forwarders Ltd.;

49. Orient Importers and Exporters;

50. Oriental Engineers;

51. Orion Eleven Pvt. Ltd.

52. Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) and its affiliates;

53. People’s Steel Mills;

54. Pervaiz Commercial Trading Co. (PCTC);

55. Premier International – Align Impex;

56. Prime International;

57. Proficient Engineers;

58. Sher Qadir;

59. Solutions Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and its affiliates;

60. Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (SUPRACO);

61. Sumico Technologies;

62. Technical Services;

63. The Tempest Trading Company;

64. Unique Technical Promoters;

65. Universal Tooling Services and its affiliates;

66. Veteran Avia LLC – Veteran Airline;

67. Wah Chemical Product Plant – Wah Noble Chemicals Ltd.;

68. Wah Munitions Plant


September 3, 2018

China Pledges $60 billion to Africa

By: Azhar Azam

China President Xi Jinping rocked the rostrum by pledging to finance a deafening $60 billion package for Africa in the form of government assistance as well as aids, investments, and loans.

In his keynote speech, he further divulged that the financing has already been either delivered or arranged.

Chinese funding will include $15 billion of grants and interest-free and concessional loans, $20 billion of credit lines, $10 billion special fund for development financing and a $5 billion special fund for financing imports from Africa.

The financial suite was announced at his maiden address at Beijing Summit 2018 of Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC). China has honored its 2015 promise to provide funding support of $60 billion, Xi said.

China has been the largest trade partner of Africa for the last nine consecutive years. From 2000 to 2017, the total trade between the two has surged by 17 times. In 2017, the trade between China and Africa increased by 14%, to $170 billion.

In the first half of the 2018, the trade fastened and grew by 16%, to $100 billion. China’s investments in Africa also increased by over 100% in the last 17 years. In the past three years, China’s investments in Africa averaged $3 billion.

Chinese commitment to provide the funding support followed the implementation of ten China-Africa cooperation plans, adopted in 2015 Johannesburg Summit

The ten cooperation plans were in the areas of industrialization, agriculture modernization, infrastructure, financial services, green development, trade and investment facilitation, poverty reduction and public welfare, public health, people-to-people exchanges, and peace and security.

According to preliminary estimates, Chinese projects completed and underway under these cooperation plans are expected to bring the continent 30,000 km of highways, 85 million tons per year of harbor capacity, over 9 million tons per day of water-cleaning capacity, and about 20,000 Megawatt of power generation capacity and creating 900,000 domestic jobs.

The ten cooperation plans have brought huge benefits to the people of China and Africa. They have fully demonstrated the creativity, rallying power and efficiency of China and Africa, and lifted China-Africa comprehensive strategic and cooperative partnership to the new heights, Xi maintained.

Since the Johannesburg Summit, China has fully implemented the ten cooperation plans, with a large number of railway, highway, airport, port, and other infrastructure projects as well as a number of economic and trade zones built or under-construction, Xi noted.

Xi underscored that China-Africa cooperation on peace and security, science, education, culture, health, poverty reduction, people’s welfare, and people-to-people exchanges has deepened.