For more than a decade, the US has labeled China as a threat to America’s economic power and global influence, viewing its rise as a “Sputnik moment.” “China is building faster trains and newer airports. Meanwhile, when our own engineers graded our nation's infrastructure, they gave us a ‘D’,” complained former US President Barack Obama in his 2011 State of the Union address.
This approach of seeing its potential “greatest teacher” as a “greatest competitor” and a challenge and treating Beijing as a scapegoat for Washington's failures at home can't be an excuse as America’s infrastructure remains dangerously overstretched in comparison with China, which is estimated to have spent ten times more than the US by percentage of GDP, and continues to receive poor grades from the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
According to the ASCE, the US infrastructure investment could widen from $3 trillion over 10 years to $3.7 trillion through 2024-2033. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal and Inflation Reduction Act in 2021 and 2022 respectively pledged $580 billion in new funding, according to the industry group: both bills will expire in 2026, leaving the US Congress to decide how to fund these programs.
Rather than implicating Beijing, Washington should review its policy that has been squandering trillions of dollars of American taxpayers’ money on its overseas military campaigns and fanning the war flames across Ukraine and the Middle East. These funds could have otherwise been utilized to build roads, airports and other infrastructure in the country, delivering tangible benefits to the US citizens.
While China has historically advocated a multipolar world order for a more balanced and peaceful planet, the US has been planning to preserve its hegemony through war strategies. These opposing approaches urged authors to describe the Chinese development path as a "winning model," considering it socio-economically effective and geopolitically peaceful against America’s “extroverted” capitalist and aggressive one.
During and in the aftermath of the cold war, the US through covert and overt military operations has been deeply focused in channeling funds to change or topple governments in countries around the world, it deemed were incompatible to its political system, under an interventionist foreign policy that asserts not only to defend but also to promote the so-called liberal international order and export democracy.
This quest of world hegemony impinged on the US development and its competitiveness. For instance, America is estimated to have just 375 miles of railway track for operations at more than 100 miles per hour. In contrast, China has built 45,000 kilometers of high-speed rail network. Washington has initiated some high-speed rail projects; it is yet to open high-speed rail line.
As the US kept pouring money in wars and conflicts to reassert its supremacy in the world, Beijing was on the way to surpass America in research and development or had already overtaken Washington in the number of researchers, bachelor’s degrees awarded and scientific journals publications and research output.
China is now considered as a scientific superpower with Beijing leading the world in terms of contributions to prestigious international peer-reviewed journals, assessed on the parameters of the quality of study, novelty and potential impact and Chinese universities expecting to produce nearly twice as many STEM PhD graduates as the US by 2025.
The threat posed by climate change demands an urgent action to reduce carbon emissions, prevent environmental degradation and accelerate energy transition. According to the International Energy Agency, China in 2023 installed almost 350 gigawatts (GWs) of new renewable capacity, more than a half of the world total.
Beijing’s target was to achieve wind and solar installed capacity of 1,200 GWs by 2030; per the Agency, it had already reached 1,130 GWs by April, setting the stage to produce more than 3,000 GWs of all types of renewables by the end of the decade. By playing an “undisputed leading role” in energy transition, China holds the key to this transformation.
Applauding China’s “remarkable surge” in clean energy investment such as solar power, electrical vehicles (EVs) and batteries, the United Nations Industrial Development Organization’s 2024 report noted that Beijing was taking a leading role in green industrialization with such investments contributing to an impressive 40% of GDP growth, offering valuable insights for other countries to craft their industrial policy.
This strategic shift toward a more sustainable and innovative growth model is unsettling the US, which has sought to build a “wall of opposition” to China over alleged industrial overcapacity and is defending irrational tariffs on Chinese EVs, solar energy products and semiconductors that aim to slow China’s high-quality development but will also decelerate pace of global energy transition.
By overemphasizing differences, the US over the last decade or so shut several areas of cooperation where the Beijing and Washington would have jointly contributed to each other’s and global development; Washington’s fixation on geopolitical rivalry with Beijing is preventing it from seizing the opportunities presented by the world’s second largest economy. The European Union’s protectionist move to levy duties on Chinese EVs too is motivated by geopolitics rather than evidence and will hurt the bloc’s own interest in green transition, costing European consumers billions of euros.
China’s focus on high-quality growth, capacity to churn out green technology in large volumes, approach to build an open and inclusive world of lasting peace and shared prosperity and willingness to share technology and benefits of its development with developing countries in addition to policy of non-intervention, peacemaking efforts such as the Iran-Saudi Arabia deal and non-imposition of its governance model on others are some of the important instances, the US can draw lessons from.
But in order to truly learn from China, it’s crucial for the US to dissuade itself from ideology-driven threat inflation, which has repeatedly blundered the country in costly quagmires, promote international cooperation on trade and technology and zero in on the well-being of its people including through domestic infrastructure development.
*My arrticle (unedited) that first appeared in the Express Tribune
*My arrticle (unedited) that first appeared in the Express Tribune